![]() Similarly, how this policy will apply to the media is not entirely clear.įor the first generation to grow up on Facebook, online identities hold both promise and pitfall But how public interest will be interpreted would benefit from greater clarity. They also draw attention to a number of exceptions, including where the image is newsworthy, in the public interest, or where the subject is a public figure. Twitter has said images or videos that show people participating in public events (such as large protests or sporting events) generally wouldn’t violate the policy. It’s important to note that this is not a blanket ban on images of individuals. Civil liberties group Big Brother Watch has criticised the policy for being “overly broad”, arguing it will lead to censorship online. The change has understandably caused some consternation, particularly among photographers. Alternatively, they can have a representative do this for them. In theory, these children can now report these images once they’re old enough to understand how. It also may be helpful to children subject to “ sharenting” – having images shared online by their parents at every stage of growing up. For example, an image which reveals the location of a woman who has escaped domestic violence could put that person in significant danger if the image is seen by her abuser. This may be helpful, particularly from a safety perspective, to the groups Twitter has identified, which include women, activists, dissidents and members of minority communities. Twitter’s policy change represents a pragmatic solution, giving individuals greater control over how their image is used. People who find an image of themselves on Twitter which has been posted without their permission can report it. Many were just looking for some kind of avenue, such as it being the norm for photographs posted on social media without permission to be removed at the request of the person photographed. I found people were not necessarily seeking legal protection in this regard. Meanwhile, 75% of respondents felt social media sites should play a greater role in protecting privacy. I was quite angry about having my image shared on social media without my permission.Ī narrow majority of respondents supported an increase in legal protection of individual rights to mean that their image could not be used without consent (55% agreed, 27% were not sure and 18% disagreed). As one participant said:įortunately I didn’t look too bad and wasn’t doing anything stupid, but I’d prefer to control images of myself appearing in public. ![]() My findings were published earlier this year.Īlthough some participants were not bothered or were even pleased to come across images of themselves shared online, for others, finding images which they didn’t consent to being posted made them feel uneasy. Working from home risks online security and privacy – how to stay protectedįor my PhD, I surveyed 189 adults living in England and Wales on their experiences with images shared online, particularly via social media. ![]() On the other, private, unwanted or humiliating photographs can cause significant upset and distress, with a clash of rights between the photographer (the legal owner of the photograph) and the photographed (often laying no claim to the image). On the one hand, the freedom to photograph is fiercely defended, largely by the media and photographers. Legal protection may also be available if the image is deemed to contravene copyright or data protection provisions. For example, in relevant circumstances an individual may be protected under section 33 of the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015, which addresses image-based sexual abuse. This means there is little an individual can do to prevent an image of themselves being circulated freely online, unless it’s deemed to fall within limited legal protection. ![]() In contrast to some European countries – France, for example, has a strong privacy culture around image rights under Article 9 of the French Civil Code – the UK doesn’t have such a strong tradition of image rights.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |